Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezbob

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 05:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ezbob (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be promotional. Daily Mail is not a reliable source. No substantial coverage. Not WP:FUTUREPROOF. Barney the barney barney (talk) 17:43, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

21 January 2014 - The creator of this page has removed the 'Daily Mail' citation since it is marked as an unreliable source above. This page was not created for a promotional end, but as an informational guide for the growing number of readers inquiring about the process of online lending. There are other Wikipedia pages of its like: iwoca and kabbage for example. The creator of this page wishes to respect the wikipedia guidelines and will edit the page as needed, as well as add relevant citations. Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asafbraverman (talkcontribs) 21:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 06:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.