Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords shot in head

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
Yeah, yeah. Sure, sure. And Scott Roeder being anti-choice didn't make him a far-right douchebag, either, I'm sure.:facepalm:
 
Yeah, yeah. Sure, sure. And Scott Roeder being anti-choice didn't make him a far-right douchebag, either, I'm sure.:facepalm:



Okay where's your proof that Loughner was a far right zealot influenced by Palin?
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I don't have any "proof" as of yet. I'm sure it won't be long before there's no doubt, however, it's a reasonable assumption based on the fact that it was a democratic representative that was shot in a district "targeted" by Sarah Palin.
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
I read the story. A guy that got shot by Loughner was a tad fucked off at some teabagger activist- Is that correct? If I had just been shot by some douchebag that I thought was more than likely a teabagger I might not be very kind to some teabagger lieutenant, either. Dude didn't actually fucking shoot the teabagger, so hey, just free speech, right?
 
I read the story. A guy that got shot by Loughner was a tad fucked off at some teabagger activist- Is that correct? If I had just been shot by some douchebag that I thought was more than likely a teabagger I might not be very kind to some teabagger lieutenant, either. Dude didn't actually fucking shoot the teabagger, so hey, just free speech, right?

I give up. :horse:
 

Facetious

Moderated
^ 1.Teabagger . . 2.teabagger . . 3.teabagger . . 4 times TEABAGGER! + douche for good measure . .
Don't you just love the meaningful discourse?

Dude xfire . . . If laughner was a right winger, then why would he take his aggressions out on a pro Second Amendment / anti universal health care blue dog democrat for?
Two and two just ain't equalling four here. :confused:



On another note . .Perhaps it was already asked . . . forgive me if it was . . . What type of ammunition did the cold blooded killer use in the course of his rampage, FMJ or JHP?
 
I don't have any "proof" as of yet. I'm sure it won't be long before there's no doubt, however, it's a reasonable assumption based on the fact that it was a democratic representative that was shot in a district "targeted" by Sarah Palin.




"reasonable assumption"....................FAIL. :1orglaugh
 

xfire

New Twitter/X @cxffreeman
^ 1.Teabagger . . 2.teabagger . . 3.teabagger . . 4 times TEABAGGER! + douche for good measure . .
Don't you just love the meaningful discourse?

Hey, just consider it quid pro quo for all the times teabaggers/conservatives have used Democrat as an adjective or whenever they refer to us as anti-American or as socialists.



Dude xfire . . . If laughner was a right winger, then why would he take his aggressions out on a pro Second Amendment / anti universal health care blue dog democrat for?
Two and two just ain't equalling four here. :confused:

Why did Palin "target" that district?



On another note . .Perhaps it was already asked . . . forgive me if it was . . . What type of ammunition did the cold blooded killer use in the course of his rampage, FMJ or JHP?

I don't know if he used full metal jackets or jacketed hollow points. Haven't heard it discussed. Depends on if he wanted to kill or wound. JHP if he was looking to kill, FMJ if he wanted to wound, but honestly, that doesn't matter. He's going to fry just as crispy regardless of what sort of ammo was used.
 
That new tape was creepy, dude is a total sociopath.
 

emceeemcee

Banned
Hassan's beliefs were ground in "defending" the Ummah.


Nah that's just someone trying to make a political point. His actions were based on psychosis.


It seems in Trident's world, being a white anglo western type excludes one from the possibility of being motivated by an idealogy. That only applies to ethnic folk, muslims etc.


WASP exceptionalism ftw


Someone with a sign at a protest excercising his free speech. Are you attempting to classify that as some kind of criminal act?

Not to mention the fact that this is the internet, and those signs could easily be photoshopped.

some guy who wanted to kill Bush as well as Obama was a lefty? Logic fail.


Now Al-Qaeda are lefties. Hark- the sound of the goal posts shifting.


More of the first one.

And on a related note, you do realize your country hung people for war crimes (like the ones Bush committed) as per the Nuremberg standard, don't you? Whether or not one agrees with it or objects to it, by America's own standards the death penalty would have been appropriate for such a crime, so what those people are calling for is no way out of line with US policy.

There's a few examples of threats to Bush which emceee claims do not exist.


nah.
 

emceeemcee

Banned
Emcee you should be very aware of the threats made to former President Bush. I believe you're one of the persons who have done so on this board.

Believe being the operative word.


Besides, your response is completely dishonest considering my original question was


"Were there as many anti-Bush inspired murders carried out by the left during his 8 year term? "


You've equated threats with actual murders.
 

PirateKing

█▀█▀█ █ &#9608
Did you see that vid I just posted? It's still worrying that a man can be declared unfit to join the army (when normally anyone can get in) yet he's still stable enough to be sold a gun, there needs to be better communication between departments/organizations or some sort of standardization I don't know :dunno:
I'm not too knowledgeable of the circumstances myself, but I'm sure all he had to do was fill out a form and to get a firearm. As for why he was booted from the army, I think it was because of a drug test that came up positive. I guess the army is somewhat efficient at screening people despite contradictory belief. Who knows what inhumane acts of violence against civilians he would have ended committing if he became a soldier.
 
That's almost as bad as ''intellectual honesty'' :1orglaugh

Well, if you meant to refer to the expression; "intellectual dishonesty" this should help you better understand what it means and it's context.

Intellectual dishonesty is dishonesty in performing intellectual activities like thought or communication. Examples are:

the advocacy of a position which the advocate knows or believes to be false or misleading
the advocacy of a position which the advocate does not know to be true, and has not performed rigorous due diligence to ensure the truthfulness of the position
the conscious omission of aspects of the truth known or believed to be relevant in the particular context.

Unfortunately there is allot of it going around here.
 
I won't be apologizing if I'm wrong, CS. Why should I? It's just free speech, right?

Saying something that you know is false can be characterized as "free speech," but in a legal sense it's slander/libel, and in a deeper sense, it's disturbing. :2 cents:
 
Top