Yeah, yeah. Sure, sure. And Scott Roeder being anti-choice didn't make him a far-right douchebag, either, I'm sure.![]()
I don't have any "proof" as of yet. I'm sure it won't be long before there's no doubt, however, it's a reasonable assumption based on the fact that it was a democratic representative that was shot in a district "targeted" by Sarah Palin.
I read the story. A guy that got shot by Loughner was a tad fucked off at some teabagger activist- Is that correct? If I had just been shot by some douchebag that I thought was more than likely a teabagger I might not be very kind to some teabagger lieutenant, either. Dude didn't actually fucking shoot the teabagger, so hey, just free speech, right?
I don't have any "proof" as of yet. I'm sure it won't be long before there's no doubt, however, it's a reasonable assumption based on the fact that it was a democratic representative that was shot in a district "targeted" by Sarah Palin.
"reasonable assumption"....................FAIL. :1orglaugh
^ 1.Teabagger . . 2.teabagger . . 3.teabagger . . 4 times TEABAGGER! + douche for good measure . .
Don't you just love the meaningful discourse?
Dude xfire . . . If laughner was a right winger, then why would he take his aggressions out on a pro Second Amendment / anti universal health care blue dog democrat for?
Two and two just ain't equalling four here.![]()
On another note . .Perhaps it was already asked . . . forgive me if it was . . . What type of ammunition did the cold blooded killer use in the course of his rampage, FMJ or JHP?
Hassan's beliefs were ground in "defending" the Ummah.
There's a few examples of threats to Bush which emceee claims do not exist.
Emcee you should be very aware of the threats made to former President Bush. I believe you're one of the persons who have done so on this board.
I'm not too knowledgeable of the circumstances myself, but I'm sure all he had to do was fill out a form and to get a firearm. As for why he was booted from the army, I think it was because of a drug test that came up positive. I guess the army is somewhat efficient at screening people despite contradictory belief. Who knows what inhumane acts of violence against civilians he would have ended committing if he became a soldier.Did you see that vid I just posted? It's still worrying that a man can be declared unfit to join the army (when normally anyone can get in) yet he's still stable enough to be sold a gun, there needs to be better communication between departments/organizations or some sort of standardization I don't know :dunno:
That's almost as bad as ''intellectual honesty'' :1orglaugh
Intellectual dishonesty is dishonesty in performing intellectual activities like thought or communication. Examples are:
the advocacy of a position which the advocate knows or believes to be false or misleading
the advocacy of a position which the advocate does not know to be true, and has not performed rigorous due diligence to ensure the truthfulness of the position
the conscious omission of aspects of the truth known or believed to be relevant in the particular context.
Unfortunately there is allot of it going around here.
I won't be apologizing if I'm wrong, CS. Why should I? It's just free speech, right?
Oh, you mean like "liberals are socialists"?