Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Dorfman (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close because there is nothing in Wikipedia guidelines about allowing an AfD from more than a decade ago to be reopened. If desired, bring up for a new AfD using the proper process (with understanding a lot about this article may have changed in 10 years). SouthernNights (talk) 13:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Dorfman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable individual. No [[WP:RS] are presented in the article.Seems like self promotion Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 10:07, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Potentially quite outdated, but a good-faith nomination nonetheless.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp×g 09:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.