Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techwiki (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Techwiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural nomination. Article was prodded but is ineligible for prod due to being nominated at AfD in 2006. Prod rationale was "This is a non-notable wiki application, with no known usage or outside mention (note that there are various wikis on the web called "TechWiki", but they're not related and they all use other software). There doesn't even seem to be a homepage for Techwiki any more, indicating total abandonment of the software. Yaron K. (talk) 14:54, 16 February 2010 (UTC)"[reply]
I am neutral. —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 18:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A few book mentions and some false positives in goog news, but no in-depth coverage. Pcap ping 21:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete previously deleted after an AFD, not seeing much improvement in this article or in the subjects coverage in 3rd party sources RadioFan (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless it was deleted at AfD under a different name, the previous AfD was closed as no consensus. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It was also 4 years ago, and had little participation. Pcap ping 17:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless it was deleted at AfD under a different name, the previous AfD was closed as no consensus. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:16, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.