- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 08:47, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Srpska mreža (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable content, tagged since March 2009. Topic’s website does not appear to be active or been updated since 07/12/05. Buttons (talk) 02:16, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing to meet our inclusion-worthiness threshold owing to lack of independent and substantial published sources on the article subject. Carrite (talk) 04:08, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as this is unlikely to become anything greater than a stub due to lack of coverage and no evidence of updates. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 07:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.