Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayaprakash Mavinakuli
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 12:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jayaprakash Mavinakuli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was deprodded with the rationale, "Premature after the Notability and More Sources tags have only been applied for one day. WP:NPPDRAFT would be more appropriate." Which actually isn't correct, as the first line of that, is "A newly-created article may be about a generally acceptable topic", which this isn't. Woefully undersourced article. Searches turned up virtually zero in-depth coverage (some trivial mentions), and he has a virtually zero citation count. Has since had a press release about a very minor award, and a "Who's Who" ref added. Onel5969 TT me 11:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Doesn't meeet WP:PROF and hasn't been improved in the time given. I don't think this guy has enough mentions to be considered notable. Every tom, dick, or harry doesn't belong on WP just because they're a professor at place X.--Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:23, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 11:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 11:28, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:25, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 18:25, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - nothing more than just routine coverage Spiderone 08:45, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.